Fraud, Money Laundering and Confiscation:

R v A M (2015)

Non-custodial sentence obtained for Company Director who arranged a large number of high value false invoices in order to inflate his salary and bonuses.

R v E R (2014)

Non-custodial sentence sentence obtained for a mother who failed to reveal that she co-habited with a wealthy businessman and was an active horse-rider and claimed benefits over a protracted period on a false basis.

R v J C (2013)

Confiscation following an enormous MTIC fraud known as Operation Divert. The prosecution alleged benefit and assets of £90m, ultimately the order made was for £200,000.

R v A L – H (2013)

Five month mortgage fraud trial involving than 320,00 pages of served material. (Defending)

R v P D (2012)

Ten week boiler-room fraud where shares worth more than £14m were sold in companies that did not trade in any meaningful sense. (Defending)

R v B M (2010)

The Defendant was first on the indictment and said to be the leading organiser of a multi-million pound VAT and Duty fraud. The ten week trial involved the enquiry into multiple shell companies and a complex audit trail of monies over a 6-year period. (Defending)

Murder / Manslaughter:

R v D and S (2017)

Two young defendants were alleged to have stabbed to deatha 63-year-old man who had caused trouble for one of their mothers. The case involved the marshalling of bad character evidence from 12 witnesses. (Prosecuting)

R v B (2017)

Represented defendant alleged to have been part of a 4-man team who shot dead a rival drug dealer. The case involved complex mixed profile and gun shot residue evidence. (Defending)

R v X (2016)

Represented a 15 year-old defendant who when drug dealing was charged with the murder of a customer but was acquitted of murder and convicted of manslaughter. (Defending)

R v J M (2016)

Represented a defendant charged with the point blank shotgun shooting of 16-year-old Lewis Dunne by the canal in the Eldonian Village in Liverpool. (Defending)

R v C D (2016)

Represented a defendant who drowned his friend at a fishing lake near Bebbington, Wirral after his cannabis pipe was spike with the psychoactive drugs known as “spice”. His plea to manslaughter through loss of control was accepted and he was sentenced to 7 years’ imprisonment. (Defending)

R v D T and K D (2016)

Defendants pleaded guilty to manslaughter of a defenceless man in Leigh Town Centre in May 2016 (report here  http://www.leighjournal.co.uk/news/14732018.Men_who_attacked_dad_of_two_and_left_him_dying_in_doorway_jailed_for_manslaughter/ ) (Prosecuting)

R v R B and L K (2016) 

Defendants were convicted of the shooting of Vincent Waddington in Garston in July 2014 (report here http://www.liverpoolecho.co.uk/news/liverpool-news/vinny-waddington-murder-trial-verdict-11392628 ) (Prosecuting)

R v K D (2016)

Defendant was convicted of the murder of an 18-month-old baby to whom she had become Special Guardian (Prosecuting)

R v I G (2016)

Defendant was convicted of murdering his partner in their flat in Southport, pleaing guilty to murder after 4 days of the trial. (Prosecuting)

R v W E (2015)

Defendant was accused of the murder of Vincent Holligan, with related alternative charges of manslaughter and causing death by dangerous driving. He was acquitted of all charges. (Defending)

R v C S (2015)

Defendant was accused of murdering an off-duty police officer and seriously assaulting his two colleagues.  The defendant, a professional football coach in the USA, was acquitted of all charges. (Defending)

R v J H (2015)

Defendant was accused of luring a drug dealer to an ambush where he was stabbed to death by other drug dealers. The case involved complex arguments about withdrawal from joint enterprise and bad character. (Defending)

R v M H (2015)

Defendant drove a 4.7 litre Jeep Cherokee at his friend after an argument over obtaining the telephone number for a “bent” vet to treat a dog injured when badger baiting. The defendant pleaded guilty to manslaughter but was convicted or murder after trial. (Prosecuting)

R v J D (2015)

Defendant stabbed his friend to death outside a relative’s house. Successful opposition to the reading of the statement of an eyewitness despite the live evidence of two consultants who said that she was unfit to attend court. (Defending)

R v J H (2015)

Defendant killed his friend in his own home. He had a complicated psyhchiatric background  but diminished responsibility was defeated and he was convicted of murder. (Prosecuting)

R v A K (2015)

Defendant alleged to have killed a 64-year-old-man in her flat. There were complicated difficulties with causation, a consultant having missed the fatal injury when the deceased first went to hospital. She was convicted of manslaughter and sentenced to 9 years’ imprisonment. (Prosecuting)

R v W S (2014)

Defendant alleged to have killed his wife’s new lover by stabbing him to death in his own home then creating a false alibi. (Defending)

R v D D (2014)

Defendant alleged to have stabbed to death a pensioner in his own home in order to steal his money for drugs. The defendant was convicted following a retrial in October 2014. (Prosecuting)

R v R O’S (2014)

Defendant was one of six teenagers (some as young as 13) alleged to have murdered Sean McHugh in the back room of the Liver Launderette, Anfield, with a sword-stick. (Defending)

R v M C (2014)

Defendant pleaded guilty to assaulting and murdering Linzi Ashton, in a high-profile Manchester case of domestic violence. (Defending)

R v C C (2013)

Defendant acquitted of murder and manslaughter of a 65-year-old pensioner despite planning a professional burglary at her house and entering to remove the safe. (Defending)

R v K J (2013)

Defendant convicted of murdering a man he had met for the first time on the day of the fatal incident, both were alcoholics. (Prosecuting)

R v I L – M (2013)

Defendant alleged to be part of a wide-ranging gangland joint enterprise to kill four men in a car on a night-club car park in Nottingham. He was acquitted of the single murder and three attempted murder charges that he faced. (Defending)

R v M S (2012/2013)

12 -week murder trial in which this first defendant on the indictment was alleged to have organised the robbery and killing of her partner in order to take £40,000 of his drug trafficking proceeeds. (Defending)

R v D B (2012)

The 20-year-old defendant was convicted of the murder of a 71-year-old man who had made sexual advances towards him. (Prosecuting)

R v A W (2012)

The defendant was convicted of manslaughter through loss of control rather than murder after using a pickaxe handle to cause massive head injuries to his friend who was attacking his brother. (Defending)

R v P H (2012)

The defendant was charged with the murder of his wife after breaking into her house and inflicting multiple injuries with a kitchen knife. (Defending)

R v N J (2012)

The defendant was convicted of murder after attacking his wife with a hammer, using a screwdriver to cause neck injuries and trying to suffocate her with a tea towel. (Prosecuting)

R v S T (2012)

The defendant was charged with the murder of a former inmate of a Salvation Army Hostel but ultimately was convicted of manslaughter by virtue of lack of intent to cause really serious harm. (Defending)

R v D B (2012)

The Defendant was charged with the murder of a sex worker in 2005 in Liverpool. The case involved live evidence from 6 experts and involved standard SGM+, Low Template, SenCE, Y-STR and Identifiler DNA and the statistical analysis of the evidence by David Balding, Professor of Genetical Statistics at UCL. (Prosecuting)

R v D L (2011)

The Defendant was a drug user and alcoholic who suffered schizophrenia and personality disorders. He was charged with the murder by strangulation of his former best friend. The case involved expert evidence from three consultant psychiatrists and was one of the first cases to be tried involving defence of diminished responsibility and loss of control. (Prosecuting)

R v G H (2011)

The Defendant was charged with murdering his girlfriend’s father by stabbing him to death in his own home, following arguments over missing jewellery. The co-accused were his girlfriend, her sister and her sister’s boyfriend, all of whom blamed Mr Harding. The case involved controverial pathology and scientific evidence about the number of knives used and the mechanism of the fatal struggle. (Defending)

R v K W (2010)

The case involved a “cut throat” murder in the Benchill area of Wythenshawe, Manchester between two friends who were involved in gang related incidents. The main witnesses had all been extensively interviewed as suspects and witnesses, resulting in extensive cross examination of each. (Defending)

R v B M (2010)

The Defendant, a nurse in Southport, raped then murdered his wife on the eve of their final ancillary relief hearing. He then staged a car accident and pretended that the deceased was still alive, and made concerned phone calls to friends and family. There was a very large amount of controversial bad character evidence adduced through hearsay. The case attracted considerable local and national press interest. (Prosecuting)

R v D E (2010)

The Defendant was a 16-year-old boy charged with manslaughter where he killed his best friend as they played with a loaded gun. There was associated firearm and perverting the course of justice counts. (Defending)

Firearms:

R v C (2012)

The Defendant was charged with conspiracies to import and distribute more than 60 firearms which came in luggage hold suitcases from the USA. The case involved a very large amount of phone, Skype and cell cite evidence and detailed financial evidence, together with evidence relating to the Defendant’s alternative scenario of cannabis cultivation and supply. (Defending)

R v C R (2011)

This case raised considerable publicity when, ten weeks into the trial, two of the defendants escaped from a prison van when travelling to court from HMP Manchester. The case itself alleged two conspiracies which suggested that the defendants had orchestrated more than 20 shooting and 4 military grenade attacks in Merseyside over a 2-year period. The case involved Dutch intercept evidence, detailed firearms and controversial fingerprint evidence and complex phone evidence. (Defending)

Sexual Offences:

R v K

Serious allegations of rape were made by an escort against a prominent Liverpool Businessman. The complainant sought anonymity; a number of technical objections were made to the application, and whilst the prosecution sought unsuccessfully to remedy them the complainant withdrew her support for the prosecution and the defendant was acquitted.

G N

This nortorious case involved an allegation by the Defendant’s best friend that she disguised herself as a man and used a strap-on dildo to penetrate her a number of times. At trial the defendant was acquitted of some counts but convicted of others; Nigel successfully appealed the convictions that remained and the case is to be retried; see one of the many many press reports on the case here http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3834475/Woman-pretended-man-sex-victim-wins-appeal.html .

M B

This defendant was tried for the rape of his sister, the so-called “Queen of the Selfies” Karen Danczuk, wife of the Rochdale MP and two other women. The defendant was acquitted of the majority of the charges against him including the most serious “multiple offending” count. Unusually, Karen Danczuk waiver her anonymity post-conviction; see the Sun report here https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/2300791/selfie-queen-karen-danczuk-brands-her-brother-a-monster-for-robbing-her-of-her-childhood-after-years-of-abuse-turned-to-rape/

Other:

R v R C (2015)

Successful appeal from large drugs conspiracy in which 15 years’ imprisonment was reduced to 12.

R v H (2012)

Two day appeal in the Staff of Government Division in the Isle of Man seeking to overturn sentencing policy; involved the consideration of sentencing policy in 13 jurisdictions. (For the Appellant)

R v Z (2011)

The Defendant was charged with a series of serious rapes, the complainant and witnesses from her family all claiming anonymity. Ultimately the prosecution offered no evidence after flaws in their anonymity applications were exposed and the complainant withdrew her complaint. (Defending)

R v W H (2011)

The criminal prosecution of a solicitor for perverting the course of justice alleged to have persuaded a prosecution witnes not to give evidence at a murder trial. Difficult issues of legal professional privilege involved. (Prosecuting)

R v L I (2010)

The Defendant was charged with causing grievous bodily harm with intent of his 4-month-old daughter by shaking, The case involved expert evidence of the conventional “triad” of injuries i.e. encephalopathy, sub-dural haematoma and bi-lateral retinal haemorrhages, but was unusual because the baby had has prominent extracerebral/ subarachnoid spaces which on rare occasions have been reported to predispose a child to sub-dural haematoma even with minor trauma, and because her retinal haemorrhages were subsequently found to have resolved. (Defending)

R v P S (2010)

The Defendant, acquitted of murder in Liverpool, moved to South Wales where he was alleged to have carried out a large number of very serious armed robberies, the majority of which were organised “cash-in-transit” offences but two of which involved the planned robbery in their own homes of prominent local businessmen. The case involved a very large amount of cell-site and other telecommunication evidence (Defending).